
Spring rates seem to get a lot of emphasis from car owners. This article shows how optimal spring rates can be chosen and even compared between two different cars, and why your dampers should be taken into consideration while choosing spring rates.
Manufacturers rate their springs in kg/mm or lb/in, but neither is how you should be making your spring rate decision. (For reference, though, one kg/mm is equal to 56lbs/in.)
No, instead you should be looking at the natural frequency of the spring. This is also called a spring frequency. This magical number takes into account the suspension geometry, weight, and weight distribution of the car- which just so happens to mean that natural frequencies can be fairly compared between cars. Want your car to ride like a Cadillac? Copy its spring frequencies, not its spring rates.
For comparison, here are some spring frequencies for various cars (information gathered online on various forums, so its accuracy has not been verified):
The reason we frequently see a higher spring frequency in the rear is to produce what is known as a flat ride. With a rear spring frequency slightly than the front, the rear of the car will oscillate in a sightly shorter amount of time. Done correctly, the front and rear of the chassis will complete one oscillation at exactly the same time, reducing pitching in the chassis. This usually happens at highway speeds or even higher. While the concept was created for passenger comfort, many race cars use reduced-pitching spring frequencies to aid chassis stability.
Other vehicles use equal spring frequencies front and rear. This should give bumps an equal magnitude front and rear- that is, the front and rear of the chassis should respond very similarly. This may feel more predictable than varying spring frequencies. At low speeds, where chassis pitching is inevitable with any rate, equal spring frequencies generally feel the most predictable and normal.
Some of the cars listed above use softer spring rates in the rear, contrary to conventional teachings. This may indicate that jounce bumpers have been deployed in the rear for use as secondary springs, adding to the main spring rate. It may also indicate that the manufacturer was trying to compensate for something, perhaps much softer rear dampers, which brings up two new points:
For now, this article is here to illustrate the point that spring rates are only useful for determining spring frequencies, but spring rates are somewhat irrelevant by themselves. Spring frequencies are comparable between vehicles and have a large influence over how a car behaves.